Social Inequality Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Social Inequality - Essay ExampleOf the three Webers stratification theory appears to be the most accurate farsightedness while Marxs social class theory could not prove itself in modern caller. Durkheims functionalist theory also had predicted somewhat similar characteristics and problems that exist in our society today. .Marx visualized that the historical transplant would be identical to the changes in likeness to class conflicts. He overemphasized the fact that there will be no progress if there are no class conflicts. Due to the industrial revolution, all social order, i.e., master craftsmen, journeymen, and apprentices were abolished. Marx argues that class struggle between oppressing and oppressed classes is essential for a modern social change. plain he could not devote much time to analyze and describe the life of the middle class (the class between bourgeoisie and proletariat) and said that they are small part of the ruling class but later join proletariat, the revolu tionary class. That appears to be contrary to the existing social dimensions, where the middle class has cash in ones chips one of the dominant one.Over the years many of Marxs predictions were proved wrong, for example class polarization, instead of conflicts between two main classes like what Marx argued, today our society doesnt appear to be a complex one with the emergence of middle class population in the absence of class conflicts. Another failed prediction of Marxs prediction was concentration of capital. Capital is not confined to capitalists only, but with growing numbers of ambitious smaller to medium sized entrepreneurs, the property acceptership has spread to distinct segments of the society. Anyone having some starting money can invest it in their own business. Webers stratification theory, on the other hand, presents multidimensional causes of social inequality in relation to several conflicting groups. He argues that there are various stratified social group in so ciety based on class, status and party. And these diametric groups create a kind of social inequality. Class is determined by economic order whereas status is determined by styles of life. The party consisted of people constitute political power. Like Marx, Weber also recognizes the significance of class struggle that is related to market exchange. in that respectfore, class does not comprise of just one group but virtually consisted of various kinds of economic class. According to Weber, the economic classes tend to be confined to four different social classes in capitalist society. There are propertied classes, property-less non manual class, petty bourgeoisie and manual working class. As compared to Marxs class theory there are two middle classes in Webers kind of society. The property-less non manual class and the petty bourgeoisie form the middle class in Webers theory. Petty bourgeoisie are people who own their own production such as small manufacture, business, or farm. Th e non manual working class i.e, the so called white-collar worker, are people who had education and trained to effect professional worker receiving wages in return of their work. The status groups consisted of people who have social honor or authority. They have a tendency to pick up themselves from outside of their status groups. Lastly party is designed to achieve communal action. Webers stratification theory represents todays social inequality by introducing various stratified